Brexit votes: MPs fail to back proposals again
April 2, 2019 10:31 am
MPs have again failed to agree on proposals for the next steps of Brexit.
The Commons voted on four motions for leaving the EU, including a customs union and a Norway-style arrangement – keeping the UK in the single market – but none gained a majority.
The votes were not legally binding, so the government would not have been forced to adopt the proposals.
Theresa May’s plan that she negotiated with the EU has been rejected twice by historic margins in Parliament.
The withdrawal agreement section of her deal was voted down again by MPs on Friday.
Mrs May now has until 12 April to either seek a longer extension from the EU to take a different course or decide to leave the EU without a deal.
The option defeated by the narrowest margin was a proposal for a customs union, losing by only three votes.
The motion calling for a confirmatory referendum received the most votes in favour, totalling 280, but still lost by a margin of 12.
Following the failure of his own motion to stay in the Single Market – known as Common Market 2.0 – Nick Boles resigned from the Conservative Party.
In a point of order following the results, the MP for Grantham and Stamford said he could “no longer sit for this party”, adding: “I have done everything I can to find a compromise.”
As he left the Commons, MPs were heard shouting, “don’t go Nick”, and others applauded him.
He later tweeted that he would remain an MP and sit in the Commons as “an Independent Progressive Conservative”.
Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay said the “only option” left was to find a way forward that allows the UK to leave the EU with a deal.
“The government continues to believe that the best course of action is to do so as soon as possible,” he said.
“If the House is able to pass a deal this week it may still be possible to avoid holding European elections.”
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said it was “disappointing” that none of the proposals secured a majority, but he said he wanted to remind the Commons that Mrs May’s deal had been “overwhelmingly rejected”.
He added: “If it is good enough for the prime minister to have three chances at her deal, then I suggest it’s possible the House should have a chance to consider again the options we had before us… so the House can succeed where the prime minister has failed – in presenting a credible economic relationship with Europe for the future that prevents us crashing out with no deal.”