Parliament

Law organizations are wrong: AG

September 1, 2022 4:56 pm

Attorney General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum [Source: Parliament of the Republic of Fiji]

Parliament has passed the Electoral Amendment Bill 2022 this afternoon after an intense debate from both sides of the House.

The Bill sought to amend the Act to reflect the changes recommended by the Fijian Elections Office supported by the Supervisor of Election.

Attorney General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has condemned the Fiji Law Society and the Law Council of Australia for their analysis of the Electoral (Amendment) Bill 2022.

Article continues after advertisement

Sayed-Khaiyum says the major objection by these two organizations is on Clause 3 of the Bill as the amendment to the Act will provide powers to the Supervisor of Elections necessary to carry out his or her functions under the Act, including the power to direct a person, by notice in writing, to furnish any relevant information or document.

Sayed-Khaiyum says the Fiji Law Society is wrong in saying the proposed amendments unnecessarily extend the powers of the SoE beyond those necessary to fulfil his powers and duty under the Electoral Act.

“In other words what they are saying is that now with this amendment the Supervisor of Elections can actually ask for information as to where Hon Tikoduadua went last night. It does not have anything to do with this particular amendment. It doesn’t have anything to do with this Act.”

He adds similar provisions are in the Immigration Act, the FNPF Act and the FICAC Act.

“It is already there. NFP, SODELPA, all there other people did not object to this particular provision – it’s there. Similar, verbatim – word for word – no object, but only now they are objecting to it. Why, because they read too many conspiracy book.”

Sayed-Khaiyum further questioned the Law Council of Australia’s statement where it states the use of such powers is justified only when necessary to achieve a legitimate purpose and only when accompanied by sufficient protection against their overuse or misuse.

“What is the legitimate purpose? To have an election that is credible. That is the legitimate purpose. So they are indirectly saying, if you read carefully – that if it is for legitimate purpose it is ok. Conducting an election through a proper transparent means and having it effectively monitored, having effectively enforced the laws is legitimate purpose.”

Meanwhile, The People’s Alliance has also this afternoon issued a statement supporting the views and calls made by the Fiji Law Society.

Sayed-Khaiyum says there are provisions in the Electoral Act where political parties can appeal to the Electoral Commission if they are not happy with certain decisions and can further file and appeal in the courts.